Recommendations from the French Neurogastroenterology Group for the diagnosis and management of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and intestinal methanogen overgrowth (IMO)
Type de matériel :
TexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2025.
Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : The French Neurogastroenterology Group (GFNG) initiated the drafting of recommendations for the diagnosis and management of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and intestinal methanogen overgrowth (IMO) in adults. A working group developed a total of 25 proposals based on the most recent data from the international scientific literature, addressing the following topics: definition, symptoms, risk factors, diagnostic modalities, and therapeutic approaches. Each statement was assessed using the GRADE methodology to determine its level of evidence (“high,” “moderate,” “low,” or “expert opinion”) and, where applicable, a level of recommendation (“strong,” “moderate,” “weak,” or “very weak”). The proposals were submitted to 22 experts for a two-round vote, in accordance with the Delphi method, resulting in consensus—with over 80% agreement— for 19 proposals on SIBO and 3 on IMO. One proposal on SIBO and 2 on IMO failed to reach consensus, reflecting the complexity of these conditions.
18
The French Neurogastroenterology Group (GFNG) initiated the drafting of recommendations for the diagnosis and management of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and intestinal methanogen overgrowth (IMO) in adults. A working group developed a total of 25 proposals based on the most recent data from the international scientific literature, addressing the following topics: definition, symptoms, risk factors, diagnostic modalities, and therapeutic approaches. Each statement was assessed using the GRADE methodology to determine its level of evidence (“high,” “moderate,” “low,” or “expert opinion”) and, where applicable, a level of recommendation (“strong,” “moderate,” “weak,” or “very weak”). The proposals were submitted to 22 experts for a two-round vote, in accordance with the Delphi method, resulting in consensus—with over 80% agreement— for 19 proposals on SIBO and 3 on IMO. One proposal on SIBO and 2 on IMO failed to reach consensus, reflecting the complexity of these conditions.




Réseaux sociaux