Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Political Mobilization at the Crossroads: Anti-Montagnard Revolt in a Moderate Department (June 1793)

Par : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2010. Sujet(s) : Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : Like the majority of other départements of the Paris Basin, which politically stood with the moderates, the département of Aisne seemed to display signs of a region ready to accept the anti-Montagnard insurrection in June 1793. Nonetheless, Aisne maintained its allegiance to the new power which had been put in place by the Parisian activist sectionnaires. However surprising, this stance should not be taken to imply political apathy on the part of this rural département, and still less does it indicate an absence of initiatives in favor of the insurrection. On the contrary, the failure of the insurgents could be explained by the territorial diversity of politicization. While in some areas social conflict was rife, like in the city of Saint-Quentin–the epicenter of the rebellion–in other areas political antagonism was fierce between a town and the surrounding countryside. Finally, the national political crisis of June 1793 offered an opportunity to contest the territorial and administrative hierarchies established in 1789 –€“ 90. It fueled urban rivalries and re-launched an original process of politicization, in which local and national stakes constantly interfered with one another. Rival local powers tried to outdo each other by making constant gestures of loyalty to the new central power. This in turn contributed to the failure of the insurrection. At the same time it weakened the rule of compromise put in place by the departmental administration in order to successfully exit the political crisis.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

10

Like the majority of other départements of the Paris Basin, which politically stood with the moderates, the département of Aisne seemed to display signs of a region ready to accept the anti-Montagnard insurrection in June 1793. Nonetheless, Aisne maintained its allegiance to the new power which had been put in place by the Parisian activist sectionnaires. However surprising, this stance should not be taken to imply political apathy on the part of this rural département, and still less does it indicate an absence of initiatives in favor of the insurrection. On the contrary, the failure of the insurgents could be explained by the territorial diversity of politicization. While in some areas social conflict was rife, like in the city of Saint-Quentin–the epicenter of the rebellion–in other areas political antagonism was fierce between a town and the surrounding countryside. Finally, the national political crisis of June 1793 offered an opportunity to contest the territorial and administrative hierarchies established in 1789 –€“ 90. It fueled urban rivalries and re-launched an original process of politicization, in which local and national stakes constantly interfered with one another. Rival local powers tried to outdo each other by making constant gestures of loyalty to the new central power. This in turn contributed to the failure of the insurrection. At the same time it weakened the rule of compromise put in place by the departmental administration in order to successfully exit the political crisis.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025