An intersubjective model of metapsychology with Bion
Mellier, Denis
An intersubjective model of metapsychology with Bion - 2018.
4
Bion’s work is now well known. In this paper, the author tries to show how Bion prolongs Freudian metapsychology according to a more intersubjective model that can support the development of the current clinic and its extension in very different fields. After showing how this intersubjective dimension occurs in the different stages of Bion’s work, the author specifies it according to the three classical perspectives that are used to describe metapsychology. The economic perspective is central in that Bion sought to conceptualize the subjectivation of situational trauma, where the denied affect might only emerge as “terror.” The outlines of the conflictual drives between the life drive and the death drive pose the dynamic perspective of this model. Within this, Bion includes the problematic of knowledge and awareness within a group field. He thus poses the terms of a linking work particular to psychoanalysis. The topological perspectivegoes beyond the conceptual framework of the individual psychic apparatus, which so appears only as a modality of the institutionalization of thought in the context of an analytic “psychic space,” which constantly demands to be maintained and to develop. The last point emphasizes the value of the attention necessary for the associative linking work in this intersubjective model.
An intersubjective model of metapsychology with Bion - 2018.
4
Bion’s work is now well known. In this paper, the author tries to show how Bion prolongs Freudian metapsychology according to a more intersubjective model that can support the development of the current clinic and its extension in very different fields. After showing how this intersubjective dimension occurs in the different stages of Bion’s work, the author specifies it according to the three classical perspectives that are used to describe metapsychology. The economic perspective is central in that Bion sought to conceptualize the subjectivation of situational trauma, where the denied affect might only emerge as “terror.” The outlines of the conflictual drives between the life drive and the death drive pose the dynamic perspective of this model. Within this, Bion includes the problematic of knowledge and awareness within a group field. He thus poses the terms of a linking work particular to psychoanalysis. The topological perspectivegoes beyond the conceptual framework of the individual psychic apparatus, which so appears only as a modality of the institutionalization of thought in the context of an analytic “psychic space,” which constantly demands to be maintained and to develop. The last point emphasizes the value of the attention necessary for the associative linking work in this intersubjective model.
Réseaux sociaux