Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

What jurisprudential policy should there be in order to save the “dialogue” of judges? Question(s) surrounding the reading of the judgment of the Russian Constitutional Court of July 14, 2015

Danelciuc-Colodrovschi, Natasa

What jurisprudential policy should there be in order to save the “dialogue” of judges? Question(s) surrounding the reading of the judgment of the Russian Constitutional Court of July 14, 2015 - 2016.

57

Imprimer
Ajouter à mon panier (Supprimer)
Rapporter un problème
Enregistrer la notice
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
Plus de recherches

Chercher ce titre dans :
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Online Stores (Bookfinder.com) Open Library (openlibrary.org)

What jurisprudential policy should there be in order to save the “dialogue” of judges? Question(s) surrounding the reading of the judgment of the Russian Constitutional Court of July 14, 2015

PLUDOC

Adresse

Liens utiles

What jurisprudential policy should there be in order to save the “dialogue” of judges? Question(s) surrounding the reading of the judgment of the Russian Constitutional Court of July 14, 2015

PLUDOC

Adresse

Réseaux sociaux

Liens utiles