Luxe, amour et transactions (notice n° 1001678)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02389cam a2200181 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250125134156.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Horowitz, Sarah |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Luxe, amour et transactions |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2014.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 70 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Aux xviie et xviiie siècles, les diamants étaient des biens de consommation aux significations multiples. Forme de la consommation ostentatoire, les bijoux scellaient aussi les relations Amoureuses. Ils n’étaient pas seulement un symbole de richesse, mais la richesse elle-même. En tant que monnaie qui pouvait être transmise et héritée, les bijoux étaient utilisés par les femmes pour contourner la primogéniture et les restrictions légales sur leurs droits à la propriété. Cependant, cet espace marginal pouvait aussi représenter un danger pour elles, comme Marie-Antoinette devait le découvrir durant l’affaire du collier de la Reine. Recevoir ou offrir des bijoux permettait aux femmes de posséder quelque contrôle sur la propriété, mais pouvait aussi les mettre en péril, précisément parce que les diamants étaient utilisés dans des cadres affectifs, sexuels et économiques. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The Margins of Luxury, Sentiment, and Currency: The Jewelry Culture of the Old RegimeIn the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, diamonds were a consumer good with multiple meanings that operated between the registers of status, emotion, sexuality, and wealth. Beyond serving as a marker of the wearer’s wealth and status, jewels were also used as tokens of affective or sexual relationships. At the same time they served as a form of currency and were easily converted into cash. In a legal system that restricted women’s property rights, women were able to inherit, bequeath, and give others jewelry – and thus give and receive a good with great economic value. While this culture of gift exchange allowed some women to have control over property, it could also place women in danger precisely because diamonds occupied a space between the sexual, affective, and economic, as the Diamond Necklace Affair would demonstrate. |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Bouquet, Stéphane |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Sociétés & Représentations | 38 | 2 | 2014-11-03 | p. 123-142 | 1262-2966 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-societes-et-representations-2014-2-page-123?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-societes-et-representations-2014-2-page-123?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux