La théorie sociale comme projet et comme institution (notice n° 1005853)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 04125cam a2200301 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250125135258.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Browne, Craig |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | La théorie sociale comme projet et comme institution |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2018.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 67 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Cet article soutient que la théorie sociale est conditionnée par un certain nombre de tensions constitutives et que celles-ci génèrent une pluralité d’antinomies. L’une de ces antinomies est celle qui se manifeste entre la théorie sociale comme projet et la théorie sociale comme institution. Le projet de théorie sociale a trouvé une forte impulsion dans le « nouveau mouvement théorique » associé aux travaux des théoriciens sociaux qui ont initié de nouveaux paradigmes et perspectives, comme Jürgen Habermas, Niklas Luhmann, Cornélius Castoriadis, Anthony Giddens et Michel Foucault. On soutiendra que ce développement de la théorie sociale a été conditionné par les clivages de la société capitaliste de la seconde moitié du xxe siècle et que cela s’est traduit par la centralité à ses yeux de certains problèmes comme celui du rapport entre individus et structures. L’importance des travaux de cette génération de théoriciens sociaux a été telle qu’elle a façonné l’institutionnalisation de la théorie sociale comme un espace spécifique de discussion dont on peut voir les signes évidents dans la création de nouvelles revues et associations de recherche. Pourtant, la période contemporaine semble connaître, en partie en raison de nouveaux défis, une intensification des antinomies entre la théorie sociale comme projet et comme institution, ce qui se traduit par une certaine désorientation de la théorie sociale. L’analyse cherche à clarifier la manière dont il est possible de résoudre ces nouveaux dilemmes et soutient, sans en mettre en doute la pertinence, qu’il est nécessaire pour la théorie sociale d’acquérir une meilleure compréhension de ses buts interdépendants mais cependant différents. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This paper argues that social theory is conditioned by a number of constitutive tensions and that these generate a variety of antinomies. One of these antinomies is that between social theory as a project and as an institution. The project of social theory gained strong impetus from the “new theory movement” associated with the work of social theorists that initiated new paradigms and perspectives, like Jürgen Habermas, Niklas Luhmann, Cornelius Castoriadis, Anthony Giddens, and Michel Foucault. It will be argued that this development in social theory was conditioned by the cleavages of capitalist society in the later half of twentieth century and that this was reflected in the centrality to it of problems like that of the relation of action and structure. The significance of the works of this generation of social theorists is such that it shaped the institutional formation of social theory as a distinctive space of discussion, evident in such things as the founding of journals and research associations. Yet, the contemporary period appears to be one in which the antinomies of social theory as project and institution have intensified, partly owing to new challenges, and that this has produced a certain sense of disorientation in social theory. This analysis clarifies how these dilemmas can be addressed and argues that, while the relevance of social theory is not not in doubt, there is a need for social theory to achieve a better understanding of how it can meet its interdependent, yet different, purposes. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | pragmatisme |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | modernité |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | institution |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | projet |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | théorie sociale |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Social theory |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | pragmatism |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | institution |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | project |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | modernity |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Renault, Emmanuel |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Sociologie | 9 | 1 | 2018-03-23 | p. 73-89 | 2108-8845 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-sociologie-2018-1-page-73?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-sociologie-2018-1-page-73?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux