La question de la quête d'un point de vue fondé relativement à un phénomène organisationnel (notice n° 1040677)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 03779cam a2200289 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250125175303.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Avenier, Marie-José |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | La question de la quête d'un point de vue fondé relativement à un phénomène organisationnel |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2010.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 80 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | RésuméCet article a pour projet d’examiner ce qui peut être qualifié de « point de vue fondé relativement à un phénomène organisationnel » et comment élaborer un tel point de vue lorsque la recherche est explicitement inscrite dans l’archétype des sciences de l’artificiel, lui-même fondé sur le paradigme épistémologique constructiviste radical. Ce paradigme épistémologique repose sur l’hypothèse du caractère connaissable d’un réel expérimenté par des humains, sans se prononcer sur l’existence ou la non-existence d’un réel unique tel qu’il est ou pourrait être en lui-même, en dehors de toute expérience humaine. Dans ce paradigme un « point de vue fondé relativement à un phénomène organisationnel » peut être conçu comme une représentation richement informée de ce phénomène. Un tel point de vue demeure ainsi comme une construction située et orientée par des buts. La légitimation du caractère fondé d’un certain point de vue repose sur l’éthique, la rigueur et la transparence avec lesquelles ont été menés le travail empirique et le travail épistémique effectués en vue de la construction de ce point de vue. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This article examines what can be qualified as a “justifiable view on a particular organizational phenomenon” and how to construct such a view in research projects explicitly taking place in the radical constructivist epistemological paradigm. This paradigm neither denies nor asserts the existence of an objective world populated by mind-independent entities—a “world-as-is”. It only postulates that humans cannot know such a thing as an independent, objective world that stands apart from their experience of it, while they can, however, know a “world-as-experienced”. In this paradigm, “a justifiable view on a particular organizational phenomenon” can be defined as a richly informed representation of the phenomenon, where “representation” designates a symbolic construction expressing an interpretation of a subject’s experience. Of particular note, in this paradigm it is not known if a representation is similar, or not similar, to the world that has induced the experience. As a result, such a “justifiable view” remains a situated and goal-oriented construction. The construction of justifiable views concerning organizational phenomena can be considered as a major goal of scientific research in organization studies, no matter the archetype of science in which the research is carried out—be it a science of nature or a science of the artificial. The legitimization of the justifiable character of a particular view concerning a certain phenomenon rests on the ethics, rigor and transparency with which the epistemic and empirical work contributing to the construction of this view has been carried out. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | constructivisme radical |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | travail épistémique |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | méthodologie |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | épistémologie |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | légitimation de savoirs |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | methodology |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | epistemology |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | knowledge legitimization |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | epistemic work |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | radical constructivism |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue internationale de psychosociologie | XV | 35 | 2010-01-06 | p. 49-71 | 1260-1705 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-psychosociologie-2009-35-page-49?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-psychosociologie-2009-35-page-49?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux