Argumentation scientifique et argumentation mondaine dans la sociologie académique (notice n° 112090)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01916cam a2200241 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250112011507.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Javeau, Claude |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Argumentation scientifique et argumentation mondaine dans la sociologie académique |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2001.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 6 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | RéSUMé De toutes les disciplines scientifiques, les sciences du social sont les seules à devoir argumenter face à un public étendu qui se confond avec le public tout court. Ceci revient à dire que leurs modalités d’argumentation sont bien doubles comme pour les autres sciences : en direction d’un public restreint et en direction de toute personne raisonnable, mais avec la particularité que celle-ci se croit autorisée, ce qui est pratiquement unique, à avoir un avis sur la question. L’auteur examine cette particularité à la lumière des propositions de l’argumentation moderne. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | SUMMARY Among all scientific disciplines, the social sciences are the only ones whose argumentation has to face a large audience, which is actually the public at large. It means that their modes of argumentation are indeed twofold – as in other sciences – i.e. are designed for a reduced audience as well as for any reasonable person, but taking into account that the latter thinks she/he is entitled – a practically unique occurrence – to form an opinion on the question. The author sheds light on this peculiarity with the help of modern argumentation theories. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Légitimation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Sciences sociales |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Argumentation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Legitimization |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Social Sciences |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Argumentation |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Cahiers internationaux de sociologie | 110 | 1 | 2001-03-01 | p. 83-96 | 0008-0276 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-cahiers-internationaux-de-sociologie-2001-1-page-83?lang=fr">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-cahiers-internationaux-de-sociologie-2001-1-page-83?lang=fr</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux