Urine toxicological screening method using an immunoenzymatic assay based on a biochip array technology: A comparative study of immunochromatography and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (notice n° 135246)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02796cam a2200313 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250112021256.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Metsu, David
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Urine toxicological screening method using an immunoenzymatic assay based on a biochip array technology: A comparative study of immunochromatography and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2022.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 80
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Multiparametric toxicology research is mainly based on immunochromatography (IC) and chromatography methods. A new automated method using an immunoenzymatic (IE) assay based on biochip array technology combines a short turnaround time and analytical performances similar to chromatography in terms of positivity cut-off. The aim of our study was to compare IE with IC and chromatography methods using urine samples from clinical cases. Seventy-two samples were analyzed using IC (amphetamines, opiates, benzodiazepines, THC, methadone, cocaine), IE, and chromatography (previous classes plus opioids and cathinone). The IC results were read by at least 7 operators to assess reading subjectivity. The IE, IC, and chromatography results were compared with each other. Chromatographic quantification was analyzed to understand discrepancies. Significant discrepancies (29–64%) were observed between IC and IE for most of the drug families investigated except for benzodiazepines, methadone, and opiates. These discrepancies were not identified between IE and chromatography, except for some substances (28%–67% discrepancies for buprenorphine, tramadol, and oxycodone, 100% for cathinone). In contrast to IC, the performance of IE neared those of chromatography, except for some substances for which cross-reactions need to be investigated. Reading discrepancies were frequent with IC (33% of samples) and made robust result output challenging. In conclusion, Multistat® is an interesting method for first-line toxicological screening for laboratories that don’t use the chromatography method.
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Nouhaud, Malika
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name El-Balkhi, Souleiman
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Lavit, Michel
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Paillard, Hélène
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Berthomès, Pierre
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Martinez, Chantal
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Gicquel-Bordelongue, Nathalie
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Blonstein, Benjamin
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Latier, Julien
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Billoré, Sabine
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Chassagne, Claire
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Lanot, Thomas
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Février, Frédéric
Relator term author
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Annales de Biologie Clinique | 80 | 4 | 2022-07-01 | p. 369-384 | 0003-3898
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-annales-de-biologie-clinique-2022-4-page-369?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-annales-de-biologie-clinique-2022-4-page-369?lang=en</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025