Abelard and Boethius: Between Nominalism and Realism, a Singular Response to Porphyry’s Questionnaire (notice n° 137476)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01085cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250112021857.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Michel, Bruno |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Abelard and Boethius: Between Nominalism and Realism, a Singular Response to Porphyry’s Questionnaire |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2012.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 71 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | When faced with the great aporias of the Aristotelian logical corpus, Boethius elaborated a double “theory of the unique subject” which, as I demonstrate, Abelard not only did not support, but, in fact, completely rejected. I also demonstrate that Abelard, in elaborating his own response to Porphyry’s questionnaire, adopts a position as incompatible with Boecian realism as it is with which we have come to call “Nominalism” (thinking first and foremost of Ockham). |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge | Volume 78 | 1 | 2012-02-01 | p. 131-178 | 0373-5478 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-archives-d-histoire-doctrinale-et-litteraire-du-moyen-age-2011-1-page-131?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-archives-d-histoire-doctrinale-et-litteraire-du-moyen-age-2011-1-page-131?lang=en</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux