Schelling’s Interpretation of The Science of Logic and its 20th C. Echoes (notice n° 1532381)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01229cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20251012015524.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Gissinger, Simon |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Schelling’s Interpretation of The Science of Logic and its 20th C. Echoes |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2025.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 9 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | To understand Schelling’s criticism of Hegel in his Munich lectures, this paper studies the reading of the Science of Logic that served as its matrix. This analysis shows that Schelling refuses to take the dialectical character of Hegel’s thinking seriously. Admittedly, this amounts to bracketing the immanence of such thinking in order to question it. I suggest that Schelling’s procedure can be compared to more recent interpretations in this regard. However, this approach founders on a problem that Hegel had already pointed out. Can the critique of Hegel dispense with dialectics? I try to demonstrate the enduring relevance of this issue. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger | 150 | 1 | 2025-02-20 | p. 9-22 | 0035-3833 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-philosophique-de-la-france-et-de-letranger-2025-1-page-9?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-philosophique-de-la-france-et-de-letranger-2025-1-page-9?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux