Comparaison des systèmes de classification des agents cancérogènes : causes de divergences et proposition d’équivalences (notice n° 1576797)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 04026cam a2200313 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20251214042314.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Farion, Nicolas |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Comparaison des systèmes de classification des agents cancérogènes : causes de divergences et proposition d’équivalences |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2023.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 91 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Dans le cadre de travaux de priorisation des agents potentiellement cancérogènes, les agences nationales de sécurité sanitaire, les gouvernements, d’autres organismes ainsi que des chercheurs, mettent en application diverses méthodes de priorisation. L’utilisation de calculs de scores a été retenue dans plusieurs travaux déjà publiés, afin de hiérarchiser les agents potentiellement cancérogènes. Les scores de danger des agents potentiellement cancérogènes sont fondés principalement sur les différentes classifications existantes relatives à leur cancérogénicité. Selon les travaux d’expertise des différentes instances ou équipes de recherche, des équivalences ont été réalisées entre les différentes classifications non réglementaires et la classification issue du règlement européen Classification, Labelling, Packaging (CLP), sans toujours aboutir aux mêmes résultats. Établir des équivalences formelles n’est pas possible du fait de multiples facteurs intervenant dès le début, et ce, jusqu’à la fin des processus d’évaluation des agents potentiellement cancérogènes. Cependant, du fait de similitudes entre les systèmes de classification, des équivalences statistiques ou plus détaillées selon les catégories peuvent être retenues. L’objectif de cette synthèse est, d’une part, d’identifier les points communs et les différences entre les critères de classification ainsi que les autres paramètres pouvant amener à des divergences de classification et, d’autre part, de proposer des équivalences entre la classification européenne CLP et les autres systèmes de classification. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | As part of work to prioritise potentially carcinogenic agents, national health security agencies, governments and other organisations, as well as researchers, are implementing various prioritisation methods. The use of score calculations has been chosen in several studies already published, in order to prioritise carcinogenic agents. The hazard scores of carcinogens are primarily based on the different existing classifications dedicated to the carcinogenicity of the agents. According to the expert appraisals of the various bodies or research teams, equivalences have been achieved between the various non-regulatory classifications and the European classification from the “Classification, Labelling, Packaging” (CLP) regulation, without always leading to the same results. Establishing formal equivalences is not possible due to multiple factors involved from the start to the end of the carcinogenic agent assessment process. However, due to similarities between the classification systems, statistical or more detailed equivalences according to the categories may be retained. The objective of this analysis is, on the one hand, to identify the common points and differences between the classification criteria as well as the other parameters that may lead to classification discrepancies and, on the other, to propose equivalences between the European CLP classification and other classification systems. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | agent |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | cancérogénicité |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | classification |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | critère |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | différence |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | équivalence |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | agent |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | carcinogenicity |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | classification |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | criteria |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | difference |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | equivalence |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Environnement, Risques & Santé | 22 | 1 | 2023-02-01 | p. 47-58 | 1635-0421 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://stm.cairn.info/revue-environnement-risques-et-sante-2023-1-page-47?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://stm.cairn.info/revue-environnement-risques-et-sante-2023-1-page-47?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux