Hegel a-t-il soutenu la thèse du contenu conceptuel de la perception ? (notice n° 1617515)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02157cam a2200289 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20260111084356.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Renault, Emmanuel |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Hegel a-t-il soutenu la thèse du contenu conceptuel de la perception ? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2025.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 60 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Cet article se propose d’évaluer la validité de l’attribution à Hegel par J. McDowell de sa thèse du contenu conceptuel de la perception en commençant par rappeler le sens qu’il lui donne, et les raisons qu’il invoque pour cela. Hegel, quant à lui, distingue sensation, perception et intuition, et l’on soutient que sa conception du contenu non conceptuel de la sensation l’éloigne de J. McDowell. On examine également quelques arguments ayant été formulés pour l’en rapprocher. Il s’avère en définitive que Hegel ne soutient ni cette thèse mcdowellienne ni celle de la discontinuité entre cognition animale et cognition humaine dont elle est solidaire. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This article aims to evaluate the validity of John McDowell’s attribution of his thesis on the conceptual content of perception to Hegel, beginning by recalling the meaning of, and the reasons behind, McDowell’s claim. Hegel, for his part, distinguishes sensation, perception, and intuition, and we argue that his conception of the non-conceptual content of sensation distances him from McDowell. We also examine some arguments that have been put forward to draw Hegel closer to McDowell’s position. Ultimately, it appears that Hegel supports neither McDowell’s thesis nor the related thesis of discontinuity between animal and human cognition. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | contenu conceptuel |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Hegel |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | John McDowell |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | perception |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | sensation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | conceptual content |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Hegel |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | John McDowell |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | perception |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | sensation |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Archives de philosophie | 89 | 1 | 2025-12-30 | p. 73-89 | 0003-9632 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-archives-de-philosophie-2026-1-page-73?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-archives-de-philosophie-2026-1-page-73?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux