Motivations for accepting or refusing Covid-19 vaccination in nursing homes and long-term care centers in France: the Vaccovid-senior study (notice n° 1643996)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 04803cam a2200409 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20260208000917.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Sacco, Guillaume |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Motivations for accepting or refusing Covid-19 vaccination in nursing homes and long-term care centers in France: the Vaccovid-senior study |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2026.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 56 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Background Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 remains the most powerful strategy to fight against the Covid-19 pandemic around the word. Nevertheless, the level of complete vaccination (including all recommended boosters) is not optimal, even in the most vulnerable population, i.e. older adults living in nursing homes (NH) and long-term care units (LTCU). In this context, the understanding of the patients’ reluctance to vaccination seems particularly important and our objective was to understand the acceptance or refusal mechanisms of the Covid-19 vaccine among people living in NH and LTCU. Method National French cross-sectional study conducted between June and September 202 including 101 health care professionals working in NH or LTCU and represents 10,152 residents living in the respondents’ establishments. Results The Vaccovid-Senior cohort included 323 residents (89 ± 6.5 years, 69% women, 89.2% living in NH); 179 agreed to vaccination and 144 were not vaccinated. In multivariate analysis, the only modifiable characteristics associated with the acceptance was a regular influenza vaccination (OR = 29.43; 95CI [12.11-71.53]; p Conclusions Vaccine acceptance can be improved by repeated efforts to listen to and explain the vaccine to the older population, their families, and the care teams. Isolating these situations of refusal allowed us to foresee avenues of improvement such as the communication of information on the vaccine, the nudge strategy and training to give information adapted to the level of understanding. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Contexte La vaccination contre le SARS-CoV-2 reste la stratégie la plus efficace pour lutter contre la pandémie de Covid-19 dans le monde. Néanmoins, le taux de vaccination complète (y compris toutes les doses de rappel recommandées) reste insuffisant, même parmi les populations les plus vulnérables, à savoir les personnes âgées vivant en établissements d’hébergement pour personnes âgées dépendantes (Ehpad) et en unité de soins de longue durée (USLD). Dans ce contexte, il semble particulièrement important de comprendre les réticences des patients à se faire vacciner. Notre objectif était donc de comprendre les mécanismes d’acceptation ou de refus du vaccin contre la Covid-19 chez les personnes vivant en Ehpad et en USLD. Méthode Étude transversale nationale française menée entre juin et septembre 2020 auprès de 101 professionnels de santé travaillant en Ehpad ou en USLD, représentant 10 152 résidents vivant dans les établissements des répondants. Résultats La cohorte Vaccovid-Senior comprenait 323 résidents (89 ± 6,5 ans, 69 % de femmes, 89,2 % vivant en Ehpad) ; 179 ont accepté la vaccination et 144 n’ont pas été vaccinés. Dans l’analyse multivariée, la seule caractéristique modifiable associée à l’acceptation était la vaccination régulière contre la grippe (OR = 29,43 ; IC à 95 % [12,11-71,53] ; p Conclusions L’acceptation du vaccin peut être améliorée par des efforts répétés pour écouter et expliquer le vaccin à la population âgée, à leurs familles et aux équipes soignantes. L’isolation de ces situations de refus nous a permis d’envisager des pistes d’amélioration telles que la communication d’informations sur le vaccin, la stratégie de nudging et la formation pour donner des informations adaptées au niveau de compréhension. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | acceptation de la vaccination |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Covid-19 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | personnes âgées |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Sars-Cov-2 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | vaccination |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Covid-19 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | older adults |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | SARS-CoV-2 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | vaccination motivation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | vaccine |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Chapuis, Elisa |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Michel, Emeline |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Brière, Olivier |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Aquino, Jean-Pierre |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Gavazzi, Gaétan |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Bonin-Guillaume, Sylvie |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Guerin, Olivier |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Salles, Nathalie |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Annweiler, Cédric |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | on behalf of the SFGG study group |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Gériatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie du Vieillissement | 23 | 4 | 2026-02-04 | p. 417-426 | 2115-8789 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://stm.cairn.info/revue-geriatrie-et-psychologie-neuropsychiatrie-du-vieillissement-2025-4-page-417?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://stm.cairn.info/revue-geriatrie-et-psychologie-neuropsychiatrie-du-vieillissement-2025-4-page-417?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux