Joël Blanchard, Philippe de Commynes, Paris, Fayard, 2006, 584 p. (notice n° 1651423)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02645cam a2200169 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20260208005259.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Dubois, Henri |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Joël Blanchard, Philippe de Commynes, Paris, Fayard, 2006, 584 p. |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 83 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | RESUME Les attitudes des notaires parisiens lors des querelles jansénistes entre les années 1730 et les années 1770 montrent qu’il existe au sein de la bourgeoisie de la capitale de véritables pratiques d’expression politique et critique dans l’espace public. De significatives divergences de comportement professionnel apparaissent cependant. Certains notaires acceptent de mettre les actes de leur pratique au service de la cause des appelants de la bulle Unigenitus en enregistrant des témoignages de miracles ou des protestations contre la hiérarchie ecclésiastique. D’autres, plus prudents mais pourtant dévots jansénistes notoires, bornent leur engagement à l’appartenance à une communauté spirituelle plus ou moins informelle et au soutien privé à la cause des prêtres persécutés. Ce clivage reproduit globalement les différentes origines des notaires, les premiers plus liés aux milieux du droit, les seconds issus de la bonne marchandise parisienne. Ces contrastes sociaux persistent donc jusque dans l’exercice du métier. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | ABSTRACT The article examines the behaviour of the Parisian notaries as displayed during Jansenist disputes between the 1730s and the 1770s in order to show that, within the middle class of the capital, practices of political and critical expression really existed in public space. Yet significant divergences could be distinguished between types of professional behaviour. A few notaries agreed to abide by the cause of the appellants, priests who had appealed against the papal bull Unigenitus, and serve it by their deeds : accordingly, they recorded testimonies of miracles or protests against the ecclesiastical hierarchy. Others limited their engagement to their membership of a spiritual community and private support for the cause of persecuted priests, although they were well-known devout Jansenists. This cleavage in behaviour can be put in relationship to the social origins of the notaries, the former being related to the law milieu, the latter to wealthy merchant families. Thus, social contrasts persisted within notaries’professional trade. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue historique | 645 | 1 | 2008-05-21 | p. 99zb-227zb | 0035-3264 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-historique-2008-1-page-99zb?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-historique-2008-1-page-99zb?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux