Carthage et le contrôle des littoraux africains : les deux premiers traités romano-carthaginois (notice n° 1653302)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 04063cam a2200313 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20260208005659.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Zelanti, Alain |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Carthage et le contrôle des littoraux africains : les deux premiers traités romano-carthaginois |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2019.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 48 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Les deux premiers traités entre les Carthaginois et les Romains, datés respectivement de 509 et de 348 avant notre ère, ont été transmis, de manière partielle, par l’historien grec Polybe et l’interprétation du premier est difficile. Cependant, en le replaçant dans le contexte des relations très anciennes entre les Carthaginois et les cités étrusques, attestées tant par les auteurs anciens que par l’archéologie, il est possible d’accepter la datation haute donnée par Polybe. La première difficulté est d’identifier les différents caps mentionnés dans le traité, en particulier le Beau Promontoire, le Καλὸνἀκρωτήριον du texte polybien, en évoquant l’historiographie de la question. Les Carthaginois se souciaient de protéger certains rivages africains de la fréquentation des navires étrangers, éventuellement romains, dans un contexte de fortes tensions avec les Grecs. Les traces archéologiques de fortifications puniques sur le littoral du Cap Bon le confirment. Les espaces interdits à la navigation varient entre le premier et le deuxième traité, ce qui reflète l’évolution des rapports de Carthage avec son arrière-pays et avec les cités d’Utique et de Tyr, ainsi que l’accroissement des capacités maritimes romaines. Les restrictions énoncées permettaient aux Carthaginois de contrôler la circulation des étrangers dans une grande partie de leur zone d’influence et de surveiller les activités commerciales. Les ports puniques étaient alors réservés aux marchands carthaginois. Les traités définissaient donc des espaces ouverts et des espaces fermés à la navigation, qui ressemblent aux clauses commerciales qui existaient à la même époque dans le monde grec. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Carthage and the Control of African Coastlines: The First Two Romano-Carthaginian Treaties Polybius outlines six treaties between Rome and Carthage. The first two treaties were signed in 509 and 348 BC. The Polybian dating of the first treaty has to be accepted in a background of the relations between Carthage and Etruscan cities. The first treaty is however difficult to construe because of the identification of The Fair Promontory, the Καλὸνἀκρωτήριον, mentioned by Polybius. The Carthaginians were concerned to protect the African coasts from the navigation of foreign ships, possibly Roman, in a context of strong tensions with the Greeks. The archaeological evidence of Punic fortifications on the coastline of Cape Bon confirms this. The spaces forbidden to navigation vary between the first and the second treaty, which reflects the evolution of the relations of Carthage with its hinterland and with the cities of Utica and Tyre, as well as the increase of the Roman maritime capacities. The restrictions of navigation allowed the Carthaginians to control the movement of foreigners in a large part of their area of influence and to control commercial activities. Punic ports were then reserved for Carthaginian merchants. The treaties thus defined spaces opened and spaces closed to navigation, which resemble the commercial clauses that existed at the same time in the Greek world. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Afrique antique |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Carthage |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | historiographie. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | navigation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Rome |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | traités commerciaux |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Ancient Africa |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Carthage |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Commercial Treaties |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Historiography. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Navigation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Rome |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue historique | 690 | 2 | 2019-05-28 | p. 227-249 | 0035-3264 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-historique-2019-2-page-227?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-historique-2019-2-page-227?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux