Efficacy of opioid analgesics (Izalgi® and Lamaline®): A systematic review of randomized clinical trials (notice n° 1671637)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02213cam a2200193 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20260301000504.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Montellier, Marion |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Efficacy of opioid analgesics (Izalgi® and Lamaline®): A systematic review of randomized clinical trials |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2025.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 24 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Background. Opium extract-based drugs (Lamaline® and Izalgi®) are classified as level 2 opioid analgesics according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. In the context of the proper use of analgesic drugs, particularly opium derivatives, and given the issues raised worldwide, it is important to critically asses their use. Method. This is a systematic review of the literature aimed at assessing the efficacy of opium derivatives (Lamaline®, Izalgi®) compared to placebo in the management of pain, regardless of its origin. Results. The literature search included only one multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase III non-inferiority trial comparing the drug to a placebo. Analysis of this trial using the RoB 2 tool identified a risk of bias. According to the REB method, there is insufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of opium derivatives in alleviating pain. There seems to be a lack of published data on their use. Thus, in the era of evidence-based medicine (EBM), it is legitimate to question the prescription of analgesics such as opium derivatives, in the light of the lack of robust data demonstrating their effectiveness. This study has not identified sufficient evidence (convincing or not) to recommend the prescription of Izalgi® or Lamaline®, whatever the cause of the pain, especially given their side effects. Conclusion. These results support the need to carefully evaluate the prescription of opium derivatives in pain management. Quality clinical trials are necessary to obtain a solid level of evidence. |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Vergé, Maxime |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Pouchain, Denis |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Boussageon, Rémy |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Médecine | 21 | 1 | 2025-03-03 | p. 29-34 | 1777-2044 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://stm.cairn.info/revue-medecine-2025-1-page-29?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://stm.cairn.info/revue-medecine-2025-1-page-29?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux