The Making of a Generic Tool of Government (notice n° 168895)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02122cam a2200241 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250112034617.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Boudia, Soraya |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The Making of a Generic Tool of Government |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2014.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 80 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The objective of this article is to understand how risk analysis, as a framework for science-based decision-making, became a generic tool of government. How have its typical categories and procedures, which emerged in the United States in the 1970s and 1980s and were formalized in a series of expert reports, among which the well-known “ Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process”, or Red Book, of the National Research Council, came to be used for such a wide spectrum of health and environmental issues (from nuclear technology to nanotechnologies, passing by food additives, industrial chemicals or genetically modified plants), in a wide variety of national and transnational institutional contexts, up to this day? The paper studies the series of attempts to formalize risk analysis in the 70s and 80s, with particular attention to the key steps of the development of the Red Book. It shows that genericness is an inherent property of the tool, owing to the kind of knowledge on which it is founded, and the highly proceduralized, portable forms it took. However, the paper also demonstrates that such properties are the product of recurrent public risk controversies, which created added challenges to the experts’ task of carrying out risk assessment in order to rationalize decision making. This forced them to move towards performing less mechanical and prescriptive forms of assessment. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | science and policy |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | health |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | risk |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | tool of government |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | environment |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | risk analysis |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Demortain, David |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Gouvernement et action publique | 3 | 3 | 2014-10-01 | p. 33-53 | 2260-0965 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-gouvernement-et-action-publique-2014-3-page-33?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-gouvernement-et-action-publique-2014-3-page-33?lang=en</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux