Consensus Building through Participatory Decision-Making (notice n° 171191)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 03415cam a2200265 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250112035135.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Eun, Jaeho |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Consensus Building through Participatory Decision-Making |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2017.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 8 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Cette étude consiste à mener une enquête pour identifier les facteurs déterminants à considérer lorsqu’une autorité publique essaie d’appliquer une prise de décision participative dans le processus d’élaboration des politiques. Notamment, le système du jury des citoyens expérimenté dans la ville métropolitaine de Ulsan constitue ici le champ empirique de l’observation qualitative. Le système de jury des citoyens, adopté pour résoudre le conflit local de longue durée émis avec le projet de traitement des déchets alimentaires et de recyclage que le District Nord d’Ulsan a établi au début des années 2000, est l’un des outils de gestion de conflits réussis. Néanmoins, ce cas de règlement des conflits avec succès s’avère également un cas d’échec de la politique, car l’usine de traitement des déchets alimentaires a été fermée seulement deux ans et quatre mois après son opérationnalisation. C’est en fait un cas illustratif qui montre que la gestion réussie des conflits n’entraîne pas nécessairement une mise en œuvre réussie des politiques. En conclusion, cette étude suggère une liste de contrôle de dix-huit variables à considérer pour une mise en œuvre réussie de la prise de décision participative et ceci, en trois étapes : étape de la communication initiale, de la conception alternative et de la construction de consensus. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This study is to carry out an inquiry to identify determinant factors to consider when a public authority tries to apply a participatory decision-making in the policy process. Notably the citizen jury system experimented in Northern District of Ulsan metropolitan city, constitutes here the empirical field of qualitative observation. The citizen jury system, adopted to resolve the long-lasting local conflict issued with the Food Waste Treatment and Recycling Facility project that the Northern District of Ulsan has established in the early 2000s is one of the successful conflict management tools. Nevertheless, this successful conflict resolution case is also a case of policy failure, because the Facility was closed only two years and four months after its operationalization. It is in fact an illustrative case which shows that successful conflict management does not necessarily result in successful policy implementation. As a final conclusion, this study suggests a checklist of eighteen variables to consider for a successful implementation of participatory decision-making and this, in three stages: stage of initial communication, of alternatives conception and of consensus-building. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | citizen jury |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | deliberative democracy |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | conflict management |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | participatory decision-making |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | citizen jury |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | deliberative democracy |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | conflict management |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | participatory decision-making |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Gestion et management public | Volume 5 | 2 | 2017-06-12 | p. 5-20 | 2116-8865 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-gestion-et-management-public-2016-2-page-5?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-gestion-et-management-public-2016-2-page-5?lang=en</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux