Lancetgate or scientific publication put to the test by Twitter (notice n° 1721573)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 03699cam a2200361 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20260322002233.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Schultz, Émilien |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Lancetgate or scientific publication put to the test by Twitter |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2024.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 45 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The Covid-19 pandemic led to unprecedented exposure of scientific activity in the public sphere, in which social media played a key role, eliciting both enthusiasm and concern about the changing relationship between science and society. This article focuses on the exceptional retraction of an article from the journal The Lancet – widely commented on as Lancet Gate – under fire from critics on Twitter. The article in question, published on 22 May 2020, reopened the debate on the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and sparked a massive controversy on Twitter, leading to its retraction on 6 June. Some commentators saw this sequence as a victory for the collective vigilance enabled by Twitter, acting as a decentralized platform for “post-publication peer review” (PPPR). Drawing on a survey combining analysis of online interactions and interviews, we describe in detail the conditions of attention and mobilization on the platform. Although many researchers were present and expressed themselves, their criticism remained largely individual, diluted in largely politicized and polarized commentaries, leading above all to a “disorganized scepticism” made up of a juxtaposition of positions. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | La pandémie de Covid-19 a provoqué une exposition sans précédent de l'activité scientifique dans l'espace public. Les médias sociaux ont joué un rôle central dans ces échanges, suscitant à la fois enthousiasme et inquiétude sur l’évolution des relations entre science et société. Cet article se concentre sur la rétractation exceptionnelle d’un article du journal The Lancet – largement commentée sous l’appellation de Lancet Gate – conduite à marche forcée sous le feu des critiques menées sur Twitter. En relançant les débats sur l’efficacité de l’hydroxychloroquine, l’article publié le 22 mai 2020 a en effet suscité un débat massif sur Twitter, conduisant à sa rétraction le 6 juin. Cette séquence a pu être présentée par certains commentateurs comme une victoire de la vigilance collective permise par Twitter, occupant le rôle de plateforme de « post-publication peer review » (PPPR). À partir d’une enquête croisant l’analyse des échanges en ligne et la conduite d’entretiens, nous détaillons les conditions d’attention et de mobilisation sur la plateforme. Si de nombreux chercheurs sont présents et s’expriment, leur critique reste largement individuelle, délayée dans des commentaires largement politisés et polarisés, conduisant surtout à un « scepticisme désorganisé » fait d’une juxtaposition de prises de position. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | controverse |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Covid-19 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | hydroxychloroquine |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | post publication peer review (PPPR) |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | science et société |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | controversy |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Covid-19 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | hydroxychloroquine |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | post publication peer review (PPPR) |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | science and society |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Guillouet, Simon |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Cape, Emma |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Lachenal, Guillaume |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Carey-Libbrecht, Liz |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Réseaux | o 246-247 | 4-5 | 2024-12-17 | p. 269-308 | 0751-7971 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-reseaux-2024-4-5-page-269?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-reseaux-2024-4-5-page-269?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux