Coordination, Team Reasoning, and Solution Thinking (notice n° 206386)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02041cam a2200229 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250112052427.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Guala, Francesco |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Coordination, Team Reasoning, and Solution Thinking |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2018.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 59 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Adam Morton a avancé l’idée qu’un type particulier de simulation, nommé « raisonnement par solution », permet d’expliquer comment les joueurs se coordonnent avec succès dans une interaction stratégique. Dans cet article, je développe l’idée de Morton et suggère que (i) la simulation explique comment un point focal peut générer des croyances communes, et (ii) les individus engagent dans une forme particulière de simulation lorsqu’ils raisonnent en équipe. Un aspect essentiel du raisonnement par solution est que les croyances communes sont un output, et non un input, de la coordination. Cela suggère que le rôle des croyances dans le maintien de la coordination puisse être moindre que ce qui est traditionnellement supposé dans la littérature. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Adam Morton has argued that a special kind of simulation, called “solution thinking”, explains successful coordination in games of strategic interaction. In this paper I develop Morton’s idea arguing that (i) simulation explains how focal points generate common beliefs; and (ii) people engage in a special type of simulation when they reason as a team. An important feature of solution thinking is that common beliefs are an output, rather than an input, of coordination. This suggests that they may play a less central role in sustaining coordination than previous theorists have assumed. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | team reasoning |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | simulation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | mindreading |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | common knowledge |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | coordination |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue d'économie politique | 128 | 3 | 2018-08-09 | p. 355-372 | 0373-2630 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-d-economie-politique-2018-3-page-355?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-d-economie-politique-2018-3-page-355?lang=en</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux