Innovations et nouvelles technologies en contention orthodontique collée : mise en perspective des différents fils (notice n° 2078511)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 05099cam a2200373 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20260405004818.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Boury, Paul |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Innovations et nouvelles technologies en contention orthodontique collée : mise en perspective des différents fils |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2026.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 1 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Introduction : Le choix du fil de contention est déterminant pour assurer la pérennité des résultats orthodontiques. Au-delà de la simple rétention mécanique, il doit répondre à des exigences précises en termes de conception, de propriétés physiques et de biocompatibilité. À ce jour, aucun matériau ne fait consensus et de nouvelles générations de fils continuent d’émerger pour répondre aux limites des systèmes existants. Objectif : Cet article vise à décrire et comparer divers types de fils de contention, qu’ils soient façonnés manuellement comme le fil Respond et l’Ortho-Flextech, ou issu d’un procédé robotisé tels que le Memotain, le TMA Winnove Medical ou encore le fil en PolyEther-Ether-Kétone (PEEK). Matériels et méthodes : Le « fil idéal » doit répondre à des critères de conception individualisée, de propriétés mécaniques, de qualité de surface, de biocompatibilité, de durabilité et d’esthétique. Les principales options sont les fils manuels (Respond, Ortho-FlexTech), les contentions CFAO (conception et fabrication assistée par ordinateur)/robotisées (Memotain en NiTi découpé laser, TMA Winnove plié robotiquement) et les dispositifs en PEEK usiné. Chaque solution présente des compromis : adaptabilité et souplesse versus rigidité et contrôle, isotropie des sections rondes versus anisotropie des sections carrées, coûts et logistique des procédés numériques. Discussion : Dans les multibrins, le module d’Young (E) est celui du matériau du brin unitaire ; c’est l’EI effectif (géométrie, compaction, glissements inter-brins) qui conditionne la raideur. La réussite clinique dépend autant du collage que du matériau : épaisseur régulière, résine peu chargée et distance réduite entre plots sont déterminants. La performance provient donc de la synergie fil-colle-technique. Conclusion : Les perspectives reposent sur la robotisation, l’optimisation adhésive et l’utilisation de polymères haute performance. Aucune solution ne peut cependant encore être considérée comme totalement « sans faille ». |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Introduction : The choice of retainer wire is crucial to ensuring long-lasting orthodontic results. Beyond simple mechanical retention, it must meet specific requirements in terms of design, physical properties, and biocompatibility. To date, there is no consensus on the best material, and new generations of wires continue to emerge to address the limitations of existing systems. Objective : This article aims to describe and compare various types of retainer wires, whether they are shaped manually, such as Respond and Ortho-Flextech, or produced using a robotic process, such as Memotain, TMA Winnove Medical, or PolyEther-Ether-Keton (PEEK) wire. Materials and methods : The “ideal wire” should ensure a custom fit, appropriate mechanical properties, smooth surface quality, biocompatibility, durability, and acceptable aesthetics. Current options include chairside wires (Respond and Ortho-FlexTech), CAD/CAM or robot-made retainers (laser-cut NiTi Memotain and robot-bent TMA Winnove), and milled PEEK devices. Each option involves trade-offs : adaptability and flexibility versus rigidity and control; isotropy of round sections versus anisotropy of square sections; and added costs and logistical demands associated with digital workflows. Discussion : In multistranded wires, Young’s modulus (E) corresponds to that of the base alloy; clinical stiffness depends instead on the effective EI (geometry, compaction, and inter-strand slip). Clinical success also relies heavily on bonding quality : thin, even resin layers and short spans between composite pads are as important as the wire itself. Overall performance therefore results from the synergy of wire, adhesive, and clinical technique. Conclusion : Future developments are likely to focus on increased robotization, adhesive optimization, and the use of high-performance polymers. However, no current solution can yet be considered flawless. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Biocompatibilité |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | CFAO |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Contention |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Fil |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Orthodontie |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Récidive |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Rigidité |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Robotisation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Biocompatibility |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | CAD/CAM |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Durability |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Orthodontics |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Relapse |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Retention |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Robotization |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Wire |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Le Gall, Michel |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | L'Orthodontie Française | 96 | 4 | 2026-03-03 | p. 353-365 | 1966-5202 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://stm.cairn.info/revue-lorthodontie-francaise-2025-4-page-353?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://stm.cairn.info/revue-lorthodontie-francaise-2025-4-page-353?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux