Rebuttal of The Betrayal of Anne Frank by Rosemary Sullivan (notice n° 216570)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 01292cam a2200169 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250112054903.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | van der Boom, Bart |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Rebuttal of The Betrayal of Anne Frank by Rosemary Sullivan |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2022.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 78 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | The publication on January 17, 2022 of a book entitled The Betrayal of Anne Frank by best-selling author Rosemary Sullivan, claiming to “understand what triggered the roundup of August 4, 1944,” during which the young diarist was arrested and deported, has caused a shockwave and controversy. The book’s thesis pointed to a “traitor,” Arnold van den Bergh, a Jewish notary, humanitarian activist, and member of the Jewish Council. Rigorous research by four specialists from the NIOD Institute for War, Holocaust, and Genocide Studies led to a report refuting this position point by point. This article presents the report’s central argument and conclusion and proposes an overview of the current media and memory-related debate. |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Vastenhout, Laurien |
Relator term | author |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Revue d’Histoire de la Shoah | o 216 | 2 | 2022-09-29 | p. 335-358 | 2111-885X |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-d-histoire-de-la-shoah-2022-2-page-335?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-d-histoire-de-la-shoah-2022-2-page-335?lang=en</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux