Is the Effect of Justifications on Regret Direct or Indirect? (notice n° 220107)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01758cam a2200229 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250112055753.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Bonnefon, Jean-François
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Is the Effect of Justifications on Regret Direct or Indirect?
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2007.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 36
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The psychology of regret has established that a well-justified decision with negative consequences is regretted less, ceteris paribus, than an ill-justified decision of comparable consequences. The question then arises of whether this effect is direct (as Decision Justification Theory would appear to suggest), or indirect – and in that case, what could be potential mediators of the effect. We suggest mediation by counterfactual mutation, that is, the mental simulation of a world where the decision would not have been made. We hypothesise that a good justification makes that simulation more difficult, which in turn decreases regret. An experiment conducted on a sample of more than 900 participants, using the routine-deviation paradigm, shows that this mediation exists but is only partial. Justifications thus have a twofold effect on regret, at the same time direct and indirect. This result sharpens our understanding of the emotion of regret, and call for refinements of Decision Justification Theory.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element mediation
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element counterfactual mutation
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element justification
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element regret
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Zhang, Jiehai
Relator term author
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Deng, Ciping
Relator term author
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Revue internationale de psychologie sociale | Volume 20 | 2 | 2007-05-01 | p. 131-145 | 0992-986X
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2007-2-page-131?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2007-2-page-131?lang=en</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025