US sub-national governmental response to the ‘Great Recession’: implications for the ‘equitable distribution of the costs and benefits of public services’ (notice n° 220226)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02103cam a2200169 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250112055808.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Wooldridge, Blue |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | US sub-national governmental response to the ‘Great Recession’: implications for the ‘equitable distribution of the costs and benefits of public services’ |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2017.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 66 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Experts suggest that when faced with fiscal stress public managers can engage in three coping practices: an actual cutback in services, expansion of existing financial resources, or reduction in work force. During the Great Recession (2007–2012), US subnational governments utilized all three of these practices. The purpose of this article is to identify coping mechanisms used by state and local governments to respond to the Great Recession, and identify approaches to minimize the negative and disproportionate impact of these actions on women, minorities, and the economically disadvantaged. The authors provide specific examples of tactics employed by US subnational governments in response to fiscal stress and evaluate the equity of their consequences on the distribution of goods and services. A review of the concept of social equity, its related literature, and an analysis of the disparate impact of coping practices on underrepresented groups is provided. Finally, the article presents mitigating strategies in order to reduce the regressive impact of these coping practices on the vulnerable populations.Points for practitionersThis article identifies ‘coping’ strategies used by US Subnational Governments in response to the Global Recession. It presents the inequities caused by these responses and suggests some ‘mitigating’ strategies to reduce the regressive impact on the disadvantaged. |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | M. Smith, Heidi Jane |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | International Review of Administrative Sciences | 83 | 3 | 2017-09-12 | p. 433-452 | 0303-965X |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-international-review-of-administrative-sciences-2017-3-page-433?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-international-review-of-administrative-sciences-2017-3-page-433?lang=en</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux