The Practitioner Psychologist, Subject of an Institutional Orthodoxy? (notice n° 220499)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02219cam a2200229 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250112055854.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Janssen, Olivier |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The Practitioner Psychologist, Subject of an Institutional Orthodoxy? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2006.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 22 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This article is part of an analysis which deals with practitioners psychologists who are working in institutional systems meant for professional integration. It is observed that with regard to their commitments as well as to their actions, these institutional systems are based on the concepts of skills and habilities. For this reason, we ask about both the situations that require the actions of psychologists and how the last ones understand the concepts they use.From a theorical point of view, we first of all speak about the social context in which arise the concept of skills and habilities and about the consequencies of using it. And then, we consider this knowledge as an evaluative or ideological knowledge (Beauvois, 1994). This point leads us to see the institutions and their psychologists as ideological and orthodox systems (Deconchy, 1980). These systems create inwardly some socio cognitive mechanisms in order to protect all the knowledges against the attacks from the exterior. Two kinds of research allow us to verify this hypothesis. It turns thus out that practitioners psychologists install defence mechanisms of the type « social regulation » aimed at compensating the rational fragility of the knowledges on which they base their actions. In a theoretical view, these researchs allow us to consider the use of Deconchy’s model with a different population of the one that permit his experimental validation. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | statement of skills and abilities |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | evaluative knowledge |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | orthodoxy |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ideology |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | elaboration of professional plan |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Durand-Delvigne, Annick |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue internationale de psychologie sociale | Volume 19 | 3 | 2006-12-01 | p. 235-277 | 0992-986X |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2006-3-page-235?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2006-3-page-235?lang=en</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux