Norm of Internality: Critique of the Method (notice n° 220562)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01890cam a2200205 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250112055904.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Delmas, Florian
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Norm of Internality: Critique of the Method
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2009.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 67
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The norm of internality hypothesis (Dubois, 2003) is seen today as a standard theory among the French speaking social psychologists. This status was established without a critical examination of the research methods (for a notable exception, cf. Gangloff, 1997). Starting from a lack of evidence about the construct validity of internality measures, we have postulated confusion in internality questionnaires between the locus of explanations (internal versus external) and their social value. The fact that internal explanations included in these questionnaires generally have more value than their external alternatives could explain the preference observed for the former in situations which prompt normativity. Experiments 1 and 2 confirm the existence of such a bias in two distinct questionnaires. The third experiment shows that the difference in value between internal and external explanations determines strongly the choice of one of them: The explanation which has the more value is systematically preferred, even if it is external and the other one is internal. The consequences of these results are discussed for the development of a proper method for testing the norm of internality hypothesis.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element internal versus external locus of control
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element social desirability
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element construct validity
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element norm of internality
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Revue internationale de psychologie sociale | Volume 22 | 1 | 2009-04-01 | p. 39-78 | 0992-986X
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2009-1-page-39?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2009-1-page-39?lang=en</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025