Accountability in the post-Lisbon European Union (notice n° 220603)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02033cam a2200181 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250112055908.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Brandsma, Gijs Jan |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Accountability in the post-Lisbon European Union |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2016.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 34 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This special issue takes stock of recent post-Lisbon additions to the European Union’s accountability toolkit. It provides indications that older decision-making tools tend to be more accountable than newer ones, and that, in some areas, decision-making is shifting towards less accountable arenas. This introductory article reviews the debate on the gradual evolution of the European Union’s accountability system and introduces key aspects of the post-Lisbon era that can be expected to affect accountability in the European Union, and that have been overlooked by the literature thus far: delegated acts, economic governance and regulatory evaluations. The contributions to this special issue address each of these domains in detail and highlight the degree to which accountability has been enhanced. A final contribution shows how these arrangements fit into the wider landscape of already-existing European Union accountabilities and how this landscape has developed over time.Points for practitioners:There is an apparent link between the relative novelty of the institutional setting in which a governance system is embedded and its accountability. Settings that include a strong role for the European Commission tend to be the most accountable ones, while those that rely mostly on intergovernmental logics, including those that have been created outside the Treaty framework, come with significant gaps. |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Heidbreder, Eva G. |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Mastenbroek, Ellen |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | International Review of Administrative Sciences | 82 | 4 | 2016-12-06 | p. 657-673 | 0303-965X |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-international-review-of-administrative-sciences-2016-4-page-657?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-international-review-of-administrative-sciences-2016-4-page-657?lang=en</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux