Nature, Reason and Morality in Spinoza and Rousseau (notice n° 222817)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01207cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250112060452.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Charrak, André |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Nature, Reason and Morality in Spinoza and Rousseau |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2002.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 60 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | It is first through the discussion, by Pufendorf, of Tractatus theologicopoliticus, chapter XVI, that Rousseau knows Spinoza, even if a more direct and wider knowledge seems to be probable. It might be advisable to compare the theories of state of nature and natural right proposed by Spinoza and Rousseau, who are both original in the fact that they don’t postulate from the outset the use of reason. The genesis of moral relations, in both authors, encounters similar problems and confers to pity the same part before considering its rational generalisation. Actually, Rousseau wants to set up the model of a man accordant with nature, following a method which had a (provisional) place in Ethic. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue de métaphysique et de morale | o 35 | 3 | 2002-09-01 | p. 399-414 | 0035-1571 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2002-3-page-399?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2002-3-page-399?lang=en</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux