L’individualisme méthodologique comme méthode scientifique : théorie de la rationalité, explication causale, herméneutique (notice n° 320741)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 03421cam a2200337 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250118001113.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Di Nuoscio, Enzo |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | L’individualisme méthodologique comme méthode scientifique : théorie de la rationalité, explication causale, herméneutique |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2020.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 25 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | L’auteur tente de montrer qu’il existe une complémentarité précieuse entre trois perspectives épistémologiques souvent considérées comme incompatibles : l’individualisme méthodologique (IM), la théorie de l’explication scientifique fondée sur le modèle Popper-Hempel et la théorie du « cercle herméneutique » de Gadamer. L’IM ne peut représenter une logique d’explication qui garantit la scientificité des explications sociales qu’en utilisant : a) le modèle nomologique-déductif pour expliquer les causes et les conséquences (intentionnelles et non intentionnelles), surtout au niveau macro, des actions et b) l’herméneutique gadamérienne pour reconstruire les stratégies cognitives et décisionnelles subjectives. En particulier, l’auteur insiste pour démontrer que le « cercle herméneutique » de Gadamer décrit un processus cognitif qui procède par conjecture et réfutation et qu’il est fondamental pour expliquer scientifiquement l’interprétation, par l’acteur, du contexte problématique dans lequel il se trouve – fondamental donc pour reconstruire les « bonnes raisons » qui le poussent à voir dans une action donnée une solution à la situation d’incertitude qu’il connaît. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The author attempts to demonstrate that there is a valuable complementarity between three epistemological perspectives which have often been considered incompatible: methodological individualism (MI), the theory of scientific explanation based on the Popper-Hempel model and the theory of the “hermeneutic circle” of Gadamer. The MI can represent a logic of explanation that guarantees the scientificity of social explanations only by using: a) the deductive-nomological model to explain the causes and consequences (intentional and unintentional), especially at the macro level, of the actions and b) the Gadamerian hermeneutics to reconstruct the subjective cognitive and decision-making strategies. In particular, we will insist on demonstrating that Gadamer’s “hermeneutic circle” describes a cognitive process that proceeds by conjecture and refutation and that it is fundamental to scientifically explain the actor’s interpretation of the problematic context in which he finds himself and therefore to reconstruct the “good reasons” that lead him to identify a given action as a hypothesis for a solution in response to the situation of uncertainty he deals with. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Action |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Individualisme |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Praxéologie |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Herméneutique |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Explication |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Causalité |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Rationalité |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Action |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Individualism |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Hermeneutics |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Causality |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Praxeology |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Rationality |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Explanation |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | L'Année sociologique | 70 | 1 | 2020-03-13 | p. 129-151 | 0066-2399 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-l-annee-sociologique-2020-1-page-129?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-l-annee-sociologique-2020-1-page-129?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux