La motivation des sanctions, entre dits et non-dits (notice n° 349016)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02144cam a2200169 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250118025928.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Chainais, Cécile |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | La motivation des sanctions, entre dits et non-dits |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2014.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 19 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | La motivation des sanctions révèle, en pratique, une tension entre l'explicite et l'implicite, entre dits et non-dits. Des logiques inavouées, d'ordre sociologique notamment, gouvernent bien souvent les pratiques de la motivation. Des liens intimes se nouent ainsi entre la légitimité de l'instance sanctionnatrice et les modalités de la motivation qu'elle adopte. Traditionnellement, l'autorité ne se justifie pas : mieux vaut ne pas motiver ou, du moins, motiver le plus brièvement possible. Mais un changement de paradigme s'opère sur fond de redéfinition de la légitimité démocratique : le soin apporté à une motivation développée et patiemment argumentée devient un élément fondamental de la persuasion, sans laquelle nulle sanction ne peut être perçue comme légitime. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | In practice, reasoned verdicts reveal the tension between the explicit and the implicit, between what is said and what is not, with reasoning practices often being governed by unavowed arguments, in particular of a sociological nature. In this process, there are also intimate links between the legitimacy of the body handing down the verdict and the terms of its reasoning. Traditionally, an authority does not justify itself : it is better not to give any reasons at all or, at the very least, to keep those reasons as brief as possible. But a change of paradigm is underway, against the backdrop of a redefinition of democratic legitimacy : the care taken in drafting detailed and patiently argued reasoning becomes a fundamental component of persuasion, without which no punishment can ever be perceived as legitimate. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Les Cahiers de la Justice | 2 | 2 | 2014-05-02 | p. 241-258 | 1958-3702 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-les-cahiers-de-la-justice-2014-2-page-241?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-les-cahiers-de-la-justice-2014-2-page-241?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux