An Unpunished Crime? Familial Theft in Paris’ Parliamentary Law in the Eighteenth Century (notice n° 374427)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01128cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250118091109.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Doyon, Julie |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | An Unpunished Crime? Familial Theft in Paris’ Parliamentary Law in the Eighteenth Century |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2016.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 1 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | If the criminal repression of theft increases all over Europe after 1750, intra-family theft is extremely rare in the criminal court of the Paris parliament (1694-1775). This article focuses on this phenomenon and tries to explain the reason why conjugal or parental thefts are not pursued in main title. They constitute an aggravating circumstance of violence (adultery, assaults, manslaughters). Before its legal recognition in the penal Code of 1810, the rule of family immunity seems to be empirically elaborated in the French monarchy’s highest criminal court. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Annales de démographie historique | o 130 | 2 | 2016-04-14 | p. 87-102 | 0066-2062 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-annales-de-demographie-historique-2015-2-page-87?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-annales-de-demographie-historique-2015-2-page-87?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux