Engager la responsabilité administrative en cas d'abus sexuels dans l'Église ? (notice n° 387237)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02279cam a2200217 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250119030214.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Fraysse, Élise |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Engager la responsabilité administrative en cas d'abus sexuels dans l'Église ? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2024.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 52 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Initiating Administrative Liability in Cases of Sexual Abuse in the Church?The question of the State's administrative responsibility for sexual abuse committed within the Church is a perplexing one. How can the French State, since the 1905 Law of Separation [of the State and religious organisations], be held liable for acts committed within the religious sphere? Borderline cases do exist, in which this liability can be considered, albeit not without difficulty: these concern members of the clergy in Alsace-Moselle, where the “Concordat” regime [preceding the 1905 Law of Separation] still applies, and chaplains who officiate in public services. Far from a caricatured conception of the separation of Church and State, what is emerging is an intermingling of State and ecclesiastical responsibilities. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | La question de l'engagement de la responsabilité administrative de l'État concernant des abus sexuels commis au sein de l'Église laisse a priori perplexe. Comment l'État, depuis la loi de Séparation de 1905, pourrait-il être tenu pour responsable des actes commis au sein de la sphère religieuse ? Il existe pourtant des cas limites qui permettent de penser – non sans difficulté – cette responsabilité : celui des ministres du culte de l'Alsace-Moselle, laquelle se trouve encore sous régime concordataire, et celui des aumôniers qui officient dans les services publics. Loin d'une conception caricaturale de la séparation des Églises et de l'État, c'est un entremêlement des responsabilités étatique et ecclésiastique qui se dessine. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Ministres du culte en Alsace-Lorraine |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LOI DE SÉPARATION DE 1905 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Aumôniers |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Régime concordataire |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Les Cahiers de la Justice | 3 | 3 | 2024-09-26 | p. 383-393 | 1958-3702 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-les-cahiers-de-la-justice-2024-3-page-383?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-les-cahiers-de-la-justice-2024-3-page-383?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux