Have the APB and Parcoursup platforms promoted equal opportunity? (notice n° 408075)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02751cam a2200193 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250119094510.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Frouillou, Leïla |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Have the APB and Parcoursup platforms promoted equal opportunity? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2020.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 34 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Cet article s’intéresse à l’évolution des modes de régulation de l’accès des jeunes à l’enseignement supérieur en France en partant du postulat que ces modes relaient des conceptions spécifiques de l’ordre social (conservatrices ou progressistes) et de l’égalité (libérales ou sociales). L’analyse porte sur les procédures et les normes associées aux deux plateformes numériques de gestion des candidatures qui se sont succédé ces dix dernières années, Admission Post-Bac (APB) et Parcoursup, en soulignant les éléments de continuité et de changement. Il en ressort que ces plateformes ont en commun d’entretenir la stratification de l’enseignement supérieur français et son rôle dans la reproduction des inégalités tout en introduisant de nouvelles dimensions à tonalité plus marchande. Ces dimensions sont plus présentes dans la plateforme Parcoursup qui encourage explicitement les bacheliers à se comporter en sujets marchands et les universités à adopter les modes de recrutement des filières sélectives. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This article looks at how the ways of regulating young people’s access to higher education have evolved in France. It starts from the premise that these modes of regulation reflect specific conservative or progressive conceptions of the social order, and liberal or socialistic conceptions of equality. The analysis focuses on the procedures and standards associated with the two online application management platforms that have appeared over the past decade, Admission Post-Bac (APB) and its successor, Parcoursup. It also highlights elements of both continuity and change across the platforms. One point that these platforms have in common, as it turns out, is that they maintain the stratification of French higher education and its role in the perpetuation of inequalities, while introducing new elements that have a more commercial feel. These elements have a stronger presence in the Parcoursup platform, which explicitly encourages baccalaureate holders to behave as marketable subjects, and universities to adopt the recruitment methods that selective courses use. |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Pin, Clément |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | van Zanten, Agnès |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | L’Année sociologique | 70 | 2 | 2020-07-16 | p. 337-363 | 0066-2399 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-l-annee-sociologique-2020-2-page-337?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-l-annee-sociologique-2020-2-page-337?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux