Not every bit of truth is fit for deliberation (notice n° 419747)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01041cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250119124101.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Heinich, Nathalie |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Not every bit of truth is fit for deliberation |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2019.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 15 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The polysemy of the word “truth”, at least in so far as it refers to a value, makes it necessary to specify its many meanings in different fields - scientific, religious, ethical, aesthetic and so on. Applied to the question of truth in a democracy, these distinctions make it possible to argue in favour of a clear separation between scientific truth and civic truth: the only truth that democracy needs is civic (transparency and veracity of information), whereas scientific truth should not concern it any more than democracy should govern scientific activity. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Diogenes | o 261-262 | 1 | 2019-10-18 | p. 99-106 | 0419-1633 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-diogene-2018-1-page-99?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-diogene-2018-1-page-99?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux