Faut-il limiter la liberté d’expression des discours blessants ? Les affaires Slàv et Kanata (notice n° 420444)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02449cam a2200301 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250120120416.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Gauthier, Gilles
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Faut-il limiter la liberté d’expression des discours blessants ? Les affaires Slàv et Kanata
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2020.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 76
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. En regard des spectacles Slàv et Kanata, est examinée la question de la justification philosophico-éthique des discours blessants non haineux en comparant les positions divergentes de Jocelyn Maclure et de John Searle se réclamant toutes deux de la théorie des actes de discours. Après avoir fait valoir la justesse de la position de Searle, l’article propose de considérer que le différend entre les deux philosophes résulte d’une distinction fondamentale entre leurs conceptions respectives de l’éthique.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. With regard to Slàv and Kanata, the question of the philosophical and ethical justification of non-hate but hurtful speech is examined by comparing the divergent positions of Jocelyn Maclure and John Searle, both of whom claim to be based on the theory of acts of speech. After arguing in favor of the accuracy of Searle’s position, the article suggests that the difference in the two philosophers’ stances results from a fundamental distinction between their respective conceptions of ethics.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. A propósito de Slàv y Kanata, examinamos la cuestión de la justificación filosófica y ética de los discursos hirientes, que no llegan a ser discursos de odio, comparando las posiciones divergentes de Jocelyn Maclure y John Searle, ambos basados en la teoría de los actos discursivos. Después de argumentar por qué considera correcta la posición de Searle, el artículo propone considerar la disputa entre los dos filósofos como el resultado de una distinción fundamental entre sus respectivas concepciones de la ética.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element actes perlocutoires
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element liberté d’expression
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element discours blessants
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element actes illocutoires
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element éthique
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element hurtful speech
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element illocutionary acts
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element perlocutionary acts
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element ethics
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element freedom of expression
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Communications | 106 | 1 | 2020-06-17 | p. 121-132 | 0588-8018
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-communications-2020-1-page-121?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-communications-2020-1-page-121?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025