Contesting Parental Authority: Forced Religious Vocation in 18th-Century France (notice n° 448146)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02225cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121021138.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Roger, Alexandra |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Contesting Parental Authority: Forced Religious Vocation in 18th-Century France |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2013.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 52 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | In the eighteenth century, paternal power reached its pinnacle in the form of the patriarchal family. This power was typically exercised by the father, but when he died it could come to the mother, an older brother, or any relative acting as the guardian. The person holding this power was able to make discretionary decisions regarding the children’s education and careers, and obliged the children to abide by them, using physical and psychological intimidation if necessary. However, despite the fact that this power was legitimized and reinforced by the royal authority, it was questioned in the case of forced religious vocation. Indeed, children who were forced to make monastic vows by their parents were allowed to start a legal procedure for obtaining release from their vows from the Episcopal curia. Such initiatives were permitted by the Church in accordance with the rulings of the Council of Trent, but these cases were perceived as a potential threat to societal order. As a result, public institutions decided to intervene. They were not unanimous in their views on the question, even though they were representing royal power. How were the different judicial institutions called upon to address the cases of legal procedures for obtaining release of monastic vows, and how did they make judgment on them? How did the parents force their children to take monastic vows? As there were conflicts between the royal and ecclesiastic judicial institutions and, within the royal judicial institution, between the royal Council and Parliament, to what extent did these conflicts contribute to the regulation of paternal power and the redefinition of parenthood? |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Annales de démographie historique | o 125 | 1 | 2013-09-01 | p. 43-67 | 0066-2062 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-annales-de-demographie-historique-2013-1-page-43?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-annales-de-demographie-historique-2013-1-page-43?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux