The Deliberate Act: How to Model the Faculty of Judging in the Social Sciences (notice n° 450894)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01784cam a2200217 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121025006.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Parodi, Maxime |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The Deliberate Act: How to Model the Faculty of Judging in the Social Sciences |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 72 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Self-determination supposes to act knowingly. It supposes more precisely that the individuals carry out their will with the help of their reason, understood as cognitive and reflexive capacity: they should be able to represent the means to succeed, but also to judge the relevance of these means. Yet, such reflective capacity seems to have been neglected by social sciences, as if it were the privilege of academics rather than in everyone's power. Thus we propose a model of reflexion, which is composed of four moments considered necessary: the detachment, the qualification, the quantification and the abstraction. Fichte's works have provided inspiration for this model, and we have applied it to Simmel's work on the pathologies linked to the usage of money. Indeed, since acting knowingly is a performance, there are possibilities of failures. This model helps to draws out the different forms of failure. Finally, we argue that reflexion is a blind spot for the cognitive paradigm and we discuss the consequences of our model for the dispute on explanation and understanding. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | cognitive rationality |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | faculty of judgement |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | procedural rationality |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | errors of judgement |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Reflexion |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | L’Année sociologique | 58 | 2 | 2008-10-13 | p. 339-381 | 0066-2399 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-l-annee-sociologique-2008-2-page-339?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-l-annee-sociologique-2008-2-page-339?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux