Pseudepigraphy and apocryphal literature: Revisiting an ancient practice in the light of cultural memory (notice n° 481906)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01198cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121070715.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Amsler, Frédéric |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Pseudepigraphy and apocryphal literature: Revisiting an ancient practice in the light of cultural memory |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2016.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 9 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Pseudepigraphy is a complex concept that continues to provoke discussion amongst scholars as to whether or not it contains an element of deception. Maurice Halbwachs’ cultural memory approach supports the hypothesis that in first century Christianity pseudepigraphy is not an intent to deceive, but a deliberate choice made by a group whose identity became more important than the actual eyewitness testimony, because the historical memory of Jesus of Nazareth had faded with time, sustained by a doctrine that needed to be established in written form, and that was legitimated through the use of pseudonyms. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Études théologiques et religieuses | Volume 91 | 4 | 2016-12-13 | p. 541-561 | 0014-2239 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-etudes-theologiques-et-religieuses-2016-4-page-541?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-etudes-theologiques-et-religieuses-2016-4-page-541?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux