Scientific Publication: Must We Choose Between Free Access and Freedom for Research? (notice n° 497511)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 01921cam a2200193 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250121081153.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Benabou, Valérie-Laure |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Scientific Publication: Must We Choose Between Free Access and Freedom for Research? |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2010.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 45 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | The incipient clash between open access and intellectual property need not come to a head as long as the exercise of authorship rights does not contradict free access for end users. The existence of strong moral prerogatives offers the very guarantees that the scientific community is pressing for: identification of sources and traceability of the original version of a publication. The picture is not so well-tempered in the case of the Public Access movement, which has little concern for authorship and is entirely geared to knowledge dissemination as compensation for the taxpayers’ money spent on research. Taken to its logical conclusion, this would deny the very existence of authorship rights for researchers, who would lose all control over the dissemination of their work. However, the alternative solution proposed may not necessarily produce the desired results, since researchers need to have a certain amount of freedom in their work and in their communication to motivate high-quality output. Short-circuiting their intellectual control over the fate of their research is more likely to inhibit them than otherwise. But the clash between these two aspirations may yet be resolved: achieving free access does not necessarily mean destroying freedom for research. |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | authorship rights |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | authorship agreements |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | free-access publication |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Hermès, La Revue | o 57 | 2 | 2010-08-01 | p. 95-106 | 0767-9513 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-hermes-la-revue-2010-2-page-95?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-hermes-la-revue-2010-2-page-95?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux