For an ethics of commitment (notice n° 500119)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01351cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121082329.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Le Guay, Damien |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | For an ethics of commitment |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2009.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 89 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Today, commitment is difficult, if not impossible: we live in a world of “individualism of disconnection” (according to Marcel Gauchet), one that is more gaseous than solid. Once upon a time, commitment was automatic, today it has become a problem. We therefore need to relearn it, to revisit its foundations and its successive layers. Here we will distinguish between two commitment “models”: “sign-up commitment” (modeled on a contract) and “engagement commitment” (modeled on an alliance). The former, more “modern” than the latter, can be withdrawn, it is limited in time, while the second form adds an “ethical weight” to one’s “word”—one that is given and forms an engagement. This makes for a better understanding of the commitment made by service men and women and its specificities: a vocation, a feeling for the corps one joins, the shared common values. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Inflexions | o 12 | 3 | 2009-09-01 | p. 143-155 | 1772-3760 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-inflexions-2009-3-page-143?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-inflexions-2009-3-page-143?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux