Misinterpretation, Plagiary, Insult and Defamation: Objects of Litigation and Materials for Linguists. (notice n° 513508)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02156cam a2200253 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250121092209.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Vincent, Diane |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Misinterpretation, Plagiary, Insult and Defamation: Objects of Litigation and Materials for Linguists. |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2010.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 80 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | "The legal system rests on the confrontation between discourses. Defense and Accusation are obliged to present adversative positions. That discursive dimension is even more real when what is being judged is a 'word crime', i.e. when speech is at the very center of the litigation. The rules regulating prohibited language are codified in various laws, but the interpretations of what can and cannot be said are as numerous as they are subjective. When investigating the legal domain linguistically, schematically three sub-sets of research appear: 1) everything that concerns writing up legal texts, which includes anticipating the potential interpretations of utterances ; 2) research concerning the validity of proof based on the speech of witnesses or the accused; 3) contentious discourses, whether the interpretation of a damaging utterance ( e.g. slander) or the resemblance between two texts (plagiary). It is this domain of contentious discourse that is explored here, by describing the requests for expertise to which the author was led to respond, and the conceptual and methodological tools deployed so as to provide a lawyer with a satisfactory answer to his/her question. In conclusion, an ethical reflection on the tensions between academic practices, that depend on continuous questioning, and presenting proof, which does not tolerate placing facts in perspective. " |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Discourse analysis |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | speech act |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Applied linguistics |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | insult |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ethics |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Sociolinguistics |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | plagiary |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | litigation |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Langage et société | o 132 | 2 | 2010-07-23 | p. 35-50 | 0181-4095 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-langage-et-societe-2010-2-page-35?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-langage-et-societe-2010-2-page-35?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux