Setting Social Standards: The Difference between Stigma and Condemnation (notice n° 513611)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01960cam a2200229 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121092247.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Brugidou, Mathieu |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Setting Social Standards: The Difference between Stigma and Condemnation |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2013.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 83 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The study of an open-ended inquiry on energy savings highlights the differences between stigma, which reflects the existence of a social standard justified by sanctioning transgression, and condemnation, which criticizes particular aspects of public policies implementing this social standard.The paper first describes the method of investigation and analysis used to identify statements stigmatizing a social standard that is being institutionalized. This approach combines a grammatical analysis of these statements and a semantic analysis of themes identified with a vocabulary of emotions. Using the distinction made by Laurence Kaufmann between the semantic use of On and the semantic use of Nous (“They” and “We”), the analysis attempts to define the kind of community evoked by such statements. Expressions that stigmatize seem to update a community legacy, made up of habits and traditions, whereas statements of condemnation project a community based on the agreement of individuals, thereby constituting a political proposal. This paper shows, however, that these two forms of expression, clearly distinct analytically, can lead to hybrid, or “protopolitical,” forms, which can be useful in understanding the instruments of politicization. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Social norm |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | stigma |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | open-ended question |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | denunciation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | motif |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | textual data analysis |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Langage et société | o 144 | 2 | 2013-06-10 | p. 85-105 | 0181-4095 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-langage-et-societe-2013-2-page-85?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-langage-et-societe-2013-2-page-85?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux