Vocabulary from Forums about Pregnancy and Medically Assisted Procreation: Representations of the Norm and Communities (notice n° 513777)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01991cam a2200229 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121092334.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Raschini, Elisa |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Vocabulary from Forums about Pregnancy and Medically Assisted Procreation: Representations of the Norm and Communities |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2017.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 36 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Some French discussion forums devoted to pregnancy or medically assisted procreation show that commenters—all of them women—may sometimes use words such as brybry, gygy, fofos, zozos, or zhom to speak about the embryo, gynecologist, follicles, sperm, or their male companions.This article investigates how these commenters conceive of the use of such a vocabulary in relation to what they may consider the linguistic norm as well as in relation to the community that they may identify with. The folk linguistics approach allows us to identify several perspectives: on the one hand, this vocabulary, which has not yet incorporated the system of linguistic standards, may still be perceived as normal or even as prescriptive insofar as the mode of communication (the discussion forum) used by commenters is concerned; on the other hand, this same vocabulary can sometimes be considered morally blameworthy given the perceived rectitude of the standard language; finally, it can be thought of as an important element that ensures the cohesion of a discursive community, which is defined here by the mode of communication, but also and especially by gender and the bodily experience, real or desired, of pregnancy. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | linguistic norm |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | gender |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | mediated electronic communication |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | medically assisted procreation |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | neography |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | discursive community |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Langage et société | o 159 | 1 | 2017-01-25 | p. 23-39 | 0181-4095 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-langage-et-societe-2017-1-page-23?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-langage-et-societe-2017-1-page-23?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux