Proposals for artification and de-artification? Kant and the openness of the concept of fine arts (notice n° 524370)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01204cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121101343.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Lories, Danielle |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Proposals for artification and de-artification? Kant and the openness of the concept of fine arts |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2020.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 81 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The way sociology accounts for recent artifications seems to assume that a stable or historically stabilized boundary has existed between art and non-art since the modern emergence of the “fine arts” category. Sociological studies also conclude that cases of de-artification are rare and marginal. Through a reading of three paragraphs of Kant’s third Critique, this article aims to expand upon the following two points: the eighteenth century did not produce a consensus on a “fixed” list of fine arts, and some historical de-artifications reached disciplines that served as models in the very emergence of the category of fine arts. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Nouvelle revue d’esthétique | o 24 | 2 | 2020-02-07 | p. 63-71 | 2264-2595 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-nouvelle-revue-d-esthetique-2019-2-page-63?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-nouvelle-revue-d-esthetique-2019-2-page-63?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux