Architectural fantasies in Yakov Chernikhov: Overcoming mimesis through phantasia as an agent of progress (notice n° 524529)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01956cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121101410.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Charitonidou, Marianna |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Architectural fantasies in Yakov Chernikhov: Overcoming mimesis through phantasia as an agent of progress |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2021.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 42 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This article analyzes Yakov Chernikhov’s “compositions,” relating his constant search for new forms to the capacity to convert fantasies into representations. In contrast with Aristotle, who conceives mimesis as the equivalent of artistic enterprise, Chernikhov perceives his “compositions” as acts of overcoming mimesis through phantasia. The visionary illustrations of his Architectural Fantasies express his endeavor to replace words with graphic images, based on his belief that the potential of the international language of graphics to function as a forerunner of progress derives from the power of fantasy. The aim of this article is to elucidate how Chernikhov treats the tension between fantasy and reality and to examine to what extent his graphic production succeeds in overcoming mimesis through phantasia. The answer to these questions could help us explain why Chernikhov has often been judged as unclassifiable and to evaluate to what extent his attitude reflects the polarities between rationalists and constructivists. The opposition between “composition” and “construction” allows us to better understand Chernikhov’s position, both unique and fundamental, in relation to constructivism. The article highlights the fact that the essential role of phantasia for Chernikhov derives from valuing “composition” rather than “construction.” |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Nouvelle revue d’esthétique | o 27 | 1 | 2021-06-07 | p. 131-143 | 2264-2595 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-nouvelle-revue-d-esthetique-2021-1-page-131?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-nouvelle-revue-d-esthetique-2021-1-page-131?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux