Collaborations, Avoidance and Conflict between Disciplines around a Shared Field (notice n° 526129)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02280cam a2200217 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250121101918.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Massart, Clémence
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Collaborations, Avoidance and Conflict between Disciplines around a Shared Field
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2016.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 4
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Collaboration, avoidance and conflict between disciplines around a shared field. This article addresses collaborations, conflicts and avoidances that develop between disciplines over a shared field of study. In this perspective and using the notion of border zone (Kohler, 2001 and 2011), I analyzed the Sénart forest on the outskirts of Paris, the study area of researchers working on Lyme disease and its primary vector, ticks of the Ixodes genus. For sciences such as ecology, geography or epidemiology that base their assumptions on field observation and the interpretation of indices, Sénart is an exceptional site. It combines all the risk factors currently identified as favoring the persistence and development of Lyme disease cases. However, these various factors and their combinations exceed the scope of a single scientific community or a single researcher. To investigate the risk factors. interdisciplinary work developed on the Sénart case through common research projects. However, instead of remaining mere collaborative work, the project turned out to be a source of conflicts, competition and critics within the research teams involved. These issues still need addressing. In this paper I discuss the kinds of relationships and the various learning processes enabled by this shared space. I show in particular that researchers view study representativeness differently depending on their field practice. To conclude I show that the relations between these various actors seem to be determined in fine by three types of nested conditions : institutional, cognitive, and ethical.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element interdisciplinarity
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element health
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element border zone
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element environment
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Lyme disease
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Natures Sciences Sociétés | 24 | 1 | 2016-05-17 | p. 24-35 | 1240-1307
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-natures-sciences-societes-2016-1-page-24?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-natures-sciences-societes-2016-1-page-24?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025