A Convialist Laïcité (notice n° 543073)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01202cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121112833.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Baubérot-Vincent, Jean |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | A Convialist Laïcité |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2014.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 16 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The law of 1905 on the separation of Church and State was passed after more than a century of civil conflict between the “two Frances” (Republican and Catholic-monarchist). While having put an end to the regime of recognized cults subsidized by the state, this law guaranteed freedom of conscience, the free exercise of cults and church self-organisation. Threading a fine balance between opposing forces, the law of 1905 was not to the full satisfaction of any party, and it is in this sense that it is a convivial law. One century later, the law is highly consensual. Yet claims for a “new laïcité” have emerged since 2003, in contradiction with the law of 1905, according to public law professor Pierre-Henri Prélot. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue du MAUSS | o 43 | 1 | 2014-05-01 | p. 191-202 | 1247-4819 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-du-mauss-2014-1-page-191?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-du-mauss-2014-1-page-191?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux