Quality and Efficiency Programs: The Instruments Serving Social Security Policy Assessment and the Mobilization of Their Stakeholders (notice n° 550661)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 01976cam a2200169 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250121120141.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Caussat, Laurent |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Quality and Efficiency Programs: The Instruments Serving Social Security Policy Assessment and the Mobilization of Their Stakeholders |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2010.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 62 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Quality and efficiency programmes, which have been an annex to the social security’s funding laws since 2007, aspire to extend the “objectives / indicators / results” procedure implemented in 2001 in the process of the elaboration and examination of funding law projects to the domain of social security policies. While they are certainly fructuous for the analysis and allocation of budgetary resources on a relatively aggregate level, this procedure is more controversial as regards its power to incite public managers to be efficient. In the case of social security policies, it does effectively complete the current performance assessment measures that were put in place in 1996 by the objective and management conventions linking the government and the national organisations responsible for implementing them. As a result, quality and efficiency programmes concentrate on the appreciation of the final impact of policies on the populations’ income and living conditions. These programmes thus enable us to make a table of the ensemble of success reached by social security policies, as well as to measure the progress yet to be accomplished. In this respect, they are used to identify the measures for which a more in depth evaluation procedure, based on methodology to assess their exact impact, is needed. |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Chemla, Olivier |
Relator term | author |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Revue française des affaires sociales | - | 1 | 2010-07-12 | p. 161-185 | 0035-2985 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-des-affaires-sociales-2010-1-page-161?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-des-affaires-sociales-2010-1-page-161?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux