A failure of political science models? (notice n° 561836)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01988cam a2200289 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250121124000.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Hay, Colin
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title A failure of political science models?
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2021.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 11
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. In 2016, the Leave vote won the referendum on the membership of the United Kingdom in the European Union, a result that few observers had anticipated. Should we consider the fact that most political scientists were unable to predict this outcome as reflecting the failure of their theoretical models? And what are the implications for the state of political science as a discipline if it is judged primarily according to its ability to make predictive claims? Comparing the current condition of political science to that of the discipline of economics following the 2007 financial crisis, this article contends that it is a theory’s ability to retrospectively render a social event or circumstance intelligible – and not to predict it – that should be evaluated as its primary criterion for validity. Re-examining the causes of the Brexit vote, we show that the 2016 vote can be explained by several existing tenets of political science. From this perspective, we discuss what political scientists might – and might not – say about the future, if we admit that prediction does not play the same role in social science as it does in the natural sciences.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element United Kingdom
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element neoliberalism
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Brexit
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element contingency
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element predictability
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element United Kingdom
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element neoliberalism
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Brexit
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element contingency
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element predictability
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Benoît, Cyril
Relator term author
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Revue française de science politique | 71 | 4 | 2021-10-27 | p. 555-574
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-science-politique-2021-4-page-555?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-science-politique-2021-4-page-555?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025